I have written a blog post on grading a few months ago for the SoMe Team, it was posted and everything. My guide has the updated grading rules in it, so the grades that exist on the site right now.

The actual guidelines on the site have outdated grades, and some of the grades that exist, aren't even listed in there. There are still a lot of people who grade unfairly and my post is written clearly.

I have sent the updated rules to the people who have been Headmaster/Headmistress, the Minister... all in the hopes that they'd get updated. It's barely any work at all for them since it's pre-written!

I could send the post I have written in a private message of even send the link to the blog post in the comments here. I've barely even received responses to it which make me think that the big bosses here don't even care that a student takes that time out of their day to write the post, which is written to help improve the site.

Being able to navigate directly to a topic from the Marauder's Map if a person appears in the topic that appears in the Marauder's Map. As in Potterskolen.dk

It worked incredibly well under plots, and a great way to get more people to participate in several topics.


Sorry for my bad English.

I would suggest that having the status competition more often, just to make WoP really exciting when it comes to plots.
My idea would be every 3rd or 4th month

I think it would be nice, if the comments on Wall posts got hidden when there are too many (5+), somtimes there are just too many that take away a lot of space when looking through the start page.

See how many times you've eaten which food, see how many galleons you've spent, see how many assignments you've graded, see how many times you've fainted, see how many days in a row you've logged in, see exactly how many anagrams/riddles you've guessed correctly AND how many you've guessed wrong, see when you got/left a specific job, I'm sure there are more and I'd be happy to come up with more tomorrow!

Hello dear readers!

I couldn't find what I want here, so I'm making a new topic and I hope you also want what i want.

It's about pinning one specific message that contains information, like a Doc-URL for example, in a group convo that constantly receives new messages and therefore spamming the important information down until nobody can find it anymore.

People tend to ignore messages further down, so the information gets lost to them or sometimes, when you want to look at it again it's annoying to scroll so far down, so it would be brilliant to have the important stuff pinned at the top of the message, just like you can pin on Discord.

As we don't use Discord anymore for job-related stuff, it would be very helpful to have this kind of feature, so I hope you'll consider it.

Thanks for the read!

Lots of love,

Tscherri

Hiya! I’m an avid user on the phone, especially when it comes to the websit. My issue here, is the  “curtain” button you can click on to access your chest, gifts, pets etc in your profile. It’s out of proportion if you’ve got a phone with a small screen. Personally, I use iPhone 11 Pro 5.8”. Could this be sorted? The actual curtain hides when you click on it so you can’t actually see what you click on. 

It would be cool if we could decide upon relations. The options for them are not as many and yes you can add it in your BS or PT and explain your relation if you want to. But I find this a little bit tedious since there is already a site function.

It could be that when you select to have a relation with someone you can type what kind of relation you want to have like, frenemies, or mother in law, dueling partners, acquaintances. There are so many options about relationships especially amongst people you just met that “best friend” just doesn’t make sense.. 

You could also add more options but I think letting the user decide what to call it solves a lot of things and makes the job easier.

It's wonderful that you can add partners, fiancées or godparents. But how about being able to create your ex-partner relationship?

Then you don't have to delete the user directly, but still have the person in the relationship list.