I believe this is on a site-to-site basis  (a pop-up does appear but some sites don't utilize the text within it)* and the button doesn't really ask you to 'confirm' or 'acknowledge' the rules. Instead, it allows you start directly into the tutorial with the 'Star Intro' screen. This is not what I am suggesting although this pre-existing feature could probably work out well with implementing my idea.

While a minor change, it might be helpful to include or change the wording of the button or add a checkbox for people to confirm they've read it. This can be similar to how the Buy VIP button works with the user having to check 'I accept the terms and conditions' with the list of rules appearing before you are able to close it (and check the box).

* I'm not on all of the sites but in the case of the two biggest sites, P US does not include any indication of the rules (their pop-up was essentially empty) last time I've created a new account and O has a brief note that if you grade incorrectly, you'll be punished. In none of these cases are the Grading Rules linked nor are specific rules mentioned.

You don't need them to be on your relation's list for them to be dating you. If you want, you are free to add them to your profile text or backstory instead! You can also roleplay a dating relation even if you don't have them in your list. It's purely for organizational purposes only.

I might have misread the title in my early morning post, my bad. I'll retract my comment.

Do you mean the Grounds? There is the heading "Outside" with sub-headings of the Grounds, the Pitch, and the Dark Forest where you can roleplay in.

No it is not possible as trading will not be implemented. However, you can salvage cards if you have at least 10 of the same cards.

https://feedback.worldofpotter.eu/en/communities/1/topics/554-trade-chocolate-frogs-cards 

I believe this limitation is reasonable (and purposeful) as it increases the value for VIP so more people buy it (and so the site can continue running).

I know it may be frustrating but I do have several ideas you can use rather than searching for people to topic with in chat. Instead, you can probably write a wall post about roleplaying or perhaps you can owl previous roleplaying partners (or potential roleplay partners to see if they are interested). There are also a lot of topics scattered around the site that are public (most topics are public with the limitation of those in the Past) so I'm sure you can find a lot of people that way as well.

Ah, I have read a thread about that but I'm not sure what an alternative to a slug would be. I think special characters would be nice and a potential solution for this is to change is to replace accented letters with regular letters. As for more complex special characters, I would not have any idea for those (perhaps a different system all together, but that probably would be too work intensive across the sites.)

When I did change my name, I did not use any special characters but when I asked about a slug change I was told that it was not allowed. I don't remember the exact reason but I do hope this can change so my account can be more consistent.

I can see where you are coming from but I disagree.

The reason most people have a lot of pets is to gain experience and level up. This obviously comes with a cost as feeding lots of pets takes time (if the user does not have VIP) and usually a lot of money. The expenses for these users often reach 500-1000+ in-game cash (dependent on the site) per feeding cycle. This money isn't exactly easy to get as the user often relies on their own money which takes effort or from occasional generous donations.

The effort put in by these users often justify the experience they receive from the pets. It isn't easy to sustain a lot of pets on the site, especially since universal pet food (dependent on the site once again) usually costs 3-5 IG cash pet pet which is multiplied by the number of pets the user has and the amount of times it takes for the pet to be at full-hunger. The user also has to ensure the pets are sufficiently cuddled to gain the optimal amount of experience (which may not be too hard for users with a lot of pets, but I have noticed a decline in cuddling).

For all these reasons, I respectfully disagree. However, I do understand your position on this. 

I agree that this idea can be abused by rulebreakers. I don't see the utility of this rule as the user can always correct themselves in the next message.